The Australian Construction Law Newsletter (ACLN) includes articles, case notes, book reviews and up-to-date analyses on important developments in construction law.
The ACLN engages in all matters relating to building and construction law, with emphasis on construction claims, disputes and contracts, and international arbitration.
We source the most relevant and interesting material affecting the construction industry that is not necessarily available to all members of the building and construction community.
The ACLN is published six times annually – the subscription period being from January to December.
There are no pro-rata subscription options.
We understand that our subscribers have different needs, and we are pleased to offer a range of subscription options.
These range from individual to unlimited subscriptions.
The appropriate number of subscriptions depends on the number of locations your organisation has which would like access to the ACLN.
Please contact us if you are unsure.
Owen Hayford discusses the UK government’s recent independent review of the use of long-term framework agreements. The review reveals important lessons learned and Australia would do well to consider how these lessons and guidance can be applied to the Australian context.
Melissa Koo and Joseph Perkins remind us that the appropriate methodology for delay analysis is dictated by and depends on the proper construction of the contract.
Trevor Thomas explores whether Australia should move to a hybrid model for the delivery of mega infrastructure projects. He considers advantages and disadvantages of various existing models and explores ways in which those could be blended to produce alternative hybrid models.
David Cheel provides a brief overview of issues that can arise when a contract is not followed during the defects liability period and at final completion.
Philip Davenport discusses the duty of a certifier to act independently and the duty of the principal to ensure that the certifier acts independently.
Jackson Inglis and Ben Keenan refer to a District Court decision on industrial manslaughter. The case is significant because the defendant is the first individual to go to prison after being prosecuted and convicted under Queensland’s industrial manslaughter laws.